Fmr US Diplomat: Netanyahu Sees ‘Political Value’ in Turkey as Enemy

The politics of demonization are a delicate dance, where enemies can be conjured up or downplayed at whim, depending on the interests of those in power. In the current Israeli election cycle, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has found himself a new nemesis: Turkey.

According to Francis J. Ricciardone, former US Ambassador to Turkey, Netanyahu sees “political value” in portraying Turkey as Israel’s latest adversary. This strategic maneuver is not unexpected, given the electoral calculus at play. With legislative elections scheduled for October, Netanyahu is likely looking to rally his base and deflect attention from more pressing domestic concerns.

The Israeli government’s decision to label Turkey an enemy state follows a long-standing pattern of diplomatic one-upmanship in the Middle East. Regional leaders have historically exploited real or perceived conflicts with neighboring countries to shore up support at home. In this context, Netanyahu’s stance on Turkey can be seen as part of a broader effort to project strength and rally his supporters.

However, demonizing a regional power like Turkey comes with risks. By labeling Ankara an enemy, Israel may inadvertently create new challenges for its own security and diplomatic standing. The Turkish government has not taken kindly to being labeled an enemy, and Ankara has signaled that it will take reciprocal measures in response. This could include strengthening ties with Iran or other regional actors that might be seen as adversaries by Tel Aviv.

The history of Israeli-Turkish relations is marked by periods of cooperation and mutual interest, but also tension and mistrust. The 2008-2009 Gaza flotilla incident, which saw Israeli commandos storm a Turkish humanitarian aid ship, remains a contentious point in their bilateral history.

Netanyahu’s decision to label Turkey an enemy may be seen as a desperate attempt to shore up support ahead of elections. However, this approach risks exacerbating existing tensions and undermining regional stability in the long run. As the international community looks on, it is uncertain whether this calculated risk will pay off for Netanyahu or ultimately prove to be a costly gamble.

The implications of this development extend beyond the immediate bilateral relationship between Turkey and Israel. In an era marked by rising nationalism and increasing polarization, leaders who exploit enmity for short-term political gain should be viewed with caution. The consequences of such actions can lead to further destabilization and entrenched divisions within already fragile regional alliances.

As the world watches this unfolding drama, it is essential to consider the broader lessons that can be drawn from Netanyahu’s decision-making process. Will other leaders in the region follow suit, labeling Turkey an enemy as a means of securing their own positions? Or will cooler heads prevail, recognizing the risks associated with such a strategy and opting for more constructive engagement?

The answer to these questions will only become clear in time. For now, one thing is certain: the politics of enmity can be a double-edged sword, offering short-term gains but ultimately threatening the long-term stability of an already volatile region.