DaniZoldan

Bristol Church Weighs Future of Colston's Remains

· photography

The Bones of Contention: A Church Confronts its Past

The debate over what to do with Edward Colston’s remains in Bristol’s All Saints church revolves around the symbolic weight they carry, rather than their physical fate. As the diocese considers repurposing the church as a community space, the question of whether to leave Colston’s remains undisturbed or rebury them elsewhere has sparked a wider conversation about confronting troubled pasts.

The Very Rev Mandy Ford, dean of Bristol, acknowledges that there are different understandings of the theological and spiritual significance of human remains. However, given the overwhelming evidence of Colston’s involvement in slavery, it’s hard to argue with her assertion that his burial place should be preserved as a matter of Christian conscience.

Ford’s expertise in reinterment, gained from her involvement in the Leicester project to rebury Richard III, is certainly relevant to this situation. But what’s striking is not just the practical considerations but also the emotional and psychological ones. For many people in Bristol, particularly those from communities directly affected by transatlantic slavery, Colston’s presence is a painful reminder of the city’s dark history.

The potential for All Saints to become a place of truth-telling, reconciliation, and learning is immense. As Ford noted, this could be part of a broader effort to build a better future in Bristol through honest engagement with its past. The diocese has been consulting with locals, including those from white working-class areas who may not have been aware of the church’s existence.

Views on what to do with All Saints are varied and understandable. Some see it as an opportunity for healing and redemption, while others are wary of revisiting painful memories. Rev Anjali Kanagaratnam observed that there has been a “huge range of views” from those who want nothing to do with the building to those eager to reclaim its space.

As Bristol contemplates the future of All Saints, it’s essential to consider what this means for other cities grappling with their own histories of slavery and oppression. The story of Edward Colston’s remains serves as a powerful reminder that we cannot erase our pasts without acknowledging them first. By preserving his burial place, the church in Bristol is creating a space for difficult conversations about the past.

In doing so, they may be paving the way for a more authentic and inclusive understanding of their city’s identity. Ford said, “I think one can see it as part of a much bigger picture, which I think is really important if Bristol’s going to have a peaceful and flourishing future as a civic space and as a city.” The fate of All Saints church will undoubtedly be decided in the months ahead, but for now, it serves as a poignant symbol of the ongoing struggle to come to terms with our collective past.

Reader Views

  • TL
    The Lens Desk · editorial

    The proposed repurposing of All Saints church raises more questions than answers about Bristol's reckoning with its colonial past. While it's commendable that the diocese is consulting with locals, the real challenge lies in engaging with the city's white working-class communities, who often feel disconnected from historical events and institutions like this church. To truly build a better future, All Saints must become more than just a relic of a troubled era – it needs to serve as a catalyst for grassroots education and empathy-building efforts that bring these communities together around a shared understanding of Bristol's complex history.

  • TS
    Tomás S. · wedding photographer

    The question of what to do with Colston's remains is less about finding a new resting place and more about confronting the moral reckoning that his presence demands. The diocese's efforts to consult with locals are commendable, but I worry that the process may overlook the most marginalized communities who bear the weight of Bristol's historical guilt. A reburying or repurposing effort without meaningful reparations could be seen as a symbolic gesture rather than a genuine attempt at healing.

  • AN
    Aria N. · street photographer

    The debate over Colston's remains has sparked a necessary reckoning in Bristol, but let's not lose sight of the fact that true accountability requires more than just symbolic gestures. Rather than simply preserving or reburying his bones, the diocese should commit to transparently documenting and teaching the full extent of Colston's role in transatlantic slavery within the church itself. This could involve interactive exhibits, historical markers, and public events that acknowledge the past while fostering a more nuanced understanding of its ongoing impact on contemporary Bristol society.

Related articles

More from DaniZoldan

View as Web Story →